Start with the source
Our current estimates come from Creality Print G-code files that Denis supplied manually to the project. We read the slicer's footer summary and review the recorded values before displaying them. The source card identifies the file and slicer, with the available printer, material, and slicing profile details. The displayed G-code hash identifies the file that was reviewed.
The model association is a manual check of the object name, bounds, and preview. These sources do not contain an embedded STL hash. That distinction matters: a matching name alone would not establish that two files describe exactly the same geometry.
Read the figures together
- Time is the slicer's estimate for the recorded profile.
- Grams and metres describe estimated total filament consumption, rather than the measured mass of a finished part.
- Profile fields explain the context of the estimate; they are not universal print settings.
A change to the slicing profile can change the result. Use the recorded settings as context, then slice the model for your own setup. If a model has no supported, reviewed estimate, the site leaves its time and filament figures unknown instead of filling the gaps with example numbers.
Keep estimates and physical evidence separate
Digital geometry checks, slicer estimates, and a physical print answer different questions. Geometry verification does not by itself establish a successful print. Read the model's physical print status separately and look for the evidence associated with that model version.
For this estimate workflow, the project reads metadata; it does not execute the supplied G-code, send it to a printer, or publish the raw file. The figures document the reviewed slicing result and its limits.